evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums > Alternative Fuel
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 31, 2009, 10:32 PM   #1
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (15)
 
kanyonkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal/MS
Posts: 628

Drives: evo8MR + subi RS +08 Lancer

E85 vs. Q16 - discuss

Wat are the pros and cons between the 2..
I know the price difference, i know Q16 eats o2 sensors...
i need imperical evidence on what makes the most power and engine longevity...
obviously im not gonna be DD on Q16

thank you

Start talking!
__________________
Lots o' bolt on's... suspension, brakes, motor
327awhp/304awtq est. DLL @ roughly 23psi
New time:
12.13@113_____stock block, head, turbo... 6speed
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2009, 11:04 PM   #2
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (3)
 
Jim in Tucson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,025

Drives: '03 EVO VIII, '04 Prius

1. E85 makes more power than Q16.
2. E85 costs less.

I don't see there is much to discuss.

Check out these threads.

__________________
\\ IX Turbo \\ Walbro FP \\ HKS 264/264 \\ RC 1,000cc injectors \\
\\ Helix DP \\ Helix TP \\ Greddy EVO2 (modified to 3") \\ APS BOV/DV \\
\\ ETS 3" FMIC \\ Nisei LICP \\ PPI ported exhaust manifold \\ SS eBay O2 \\
\\ BR cone filter \\ BR MAF pipe \\ Hallman MBC \\ E85 \\ 394whp/418trq \\


E85 Hints and Tips
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2009, 12:11 AM   #3
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
skiracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 743

Drives: '04 BBY Evo VIII (Gone), '06 GG Evo IX

I'm sure the quality control of the fuel will be more strict and consistent at VP versus a gas station selling E85...

If you want E85 that was produced with more consistent batches, then you get Rocket Brand E85 race fuel: http://www.rockettbrand.com/techsupp...ationSheet.pdf

Or you can get yourself a Zeitronix Ethanol Content Analyzer:
http://www.zeitronix.com/Products/ECA/ECA.htm
__________________
I do not subscribe to threads, PM me for questions.
'06 Evo IX tuned by RRE Stage 1, 91 octane (320whp) and E85 (383whp)http://forums.evolutionm.net/alternative-fuel/348572-thanks-rre-stage-1e-e85-383whp-383-tq-v5-tephra-mod.html
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2009, 01:29 AM   #4
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Macaroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 460

Drives: 03 Mitsubishi Evolution

I would like to see un biased opinions on this not guys who swear by e-85. Gallon for gallon e-85 is cheaper but your using e-85 way more than q-16 if your the average DD with occasional track time. Like the OP asked, evidence is requested with dyno sheets, time slips, etc.
__________________
FPRed - 880cc injectors - Walbro 255 - Comp 280's - Prostreet Adj. cam gears - Shep trans and t-case - ACT 6 puck - EPM o2 dump - Ebay downpipe - HKS catback - ETS short route piping - Ebay fmic - 3" mafless intake - Tien S-tech's - ARP headstuds - AEM Tru Boost - AEM UEGO

Stock block - Stock head - Speed Density
TTR tuned
435 hp & 355 tq - 93 octane
494 hp & 415 tq - Q-16
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2009, 01:50 AM   #5
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: boston
Posts: 114

Drives: 03 evo VIII

but we're talking about making more power here, I believe. Not the gas mileage
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2009, 02:15 AM   #6
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Macaroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 460

Drives: 03 Mitsubishi Evolution

I didn't say anything about gas mileage. I was talking about consumption here. DD'ing on e-85 vs only using q-16 for the track and that's maybe 5 gallons tops.

I think the OP is trying to stay away from opinions and wanting something more along the lines of facts and figures and experience with both fuels on the same setup.
__________________
FPRed - 880cc injectors - Walbro 255 - Comp 280's - Prostreet Adj. cam gears - Shep trans and t-case - ACT 6 puck - EPM o2 dump - Ebay downpipe - HKS catback - ETS short route piping - Ebay fmic - 3" mafless intake - Tien S-tech's - ARP headstuds - AEM Tru Boost - AEM UEGO

Stock block - Stock head - Speed Density
TTR tuned
435 hp & 355 tq - 93 octane
494 hp & 415 tq - Q-16
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2009, 12:14 PM   #7
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (15)
 
kanyonkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal/MS
Posts: 628

Drives: evo8MR + subi RS +08 Lancer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in Tucson View Post
1. E85 makes more power than Q16.
2. E85 costs less.

I don't see there is much to discuss.

Check out these threads.

im looking more for pros AND cons BETWEEN running both setups... just 1 guy says he made more power on e85... but how about runnin ur car daily at the drag strip lets say, how long beore something bad happens runnin strictly E85 or strictly Q16... how long will the motor hold up? im talking more on the lines of a fully built motor that can handle just about anything... if its a given that E85 for surely makes more power, how come all the guys going for whp record or 1/4 mile record arent automatically goin with an E85 setup? theres more to this equation than just saying E85 is a definate maximum setup
__________________
Lots o' bolt on's... suspension, brakes, motor
327awhp/304awtq est. DLL @ roughly 23psi
New time:
12.13@113_____stock block, head, turbo... 6speed
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2009, 12:45 PM   #8
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (2)
 
bambooi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SC-Hanahan
Posts: 334

Drives: Evo IX

Quote:
Originally Posted by kanyonkid View Post
im looking more for pros AND cons BETWEEN running both setups... just 1 guy says he made more power on e85... but how about runnin ur car daily at the drag strip lets say, how long beore something bad happens runnin strictly E85 or strictly Q16... how long will the motor hold up? im talking more on the lines of a fully built motor that can handle just about anything... if its a given that E85 for surely makes more power, how come all the guys going for whp record or 1/4 mile record arent automatically goin with an E85 setup? theres more to this equation than just saying E85 is a definate maximum setup
Actually a lot of people are just going straight to e85. I know awd motorsports have been running e85 for their dyno records and drag records. To be honest I have not seen a q16/c16 tune in a while. I see everyone going double pumper and big injectors to run e85. As far as "something bad happening," if the tune is right nothing bad should happen. E85 probably cools the engine better than the c16/q16gas.
__________________
11.554 @ 122.73 (full weight minus spare tire)
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2009, 12:59 PM   #9
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (7)
 
evodrivesme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pistolvania
Posts: 570

Drives: 04 evo and sti both silver

Send a message via AIM to evodrivesme
i ran e85 my first time having the car at the track. i ran a 10.8 **** is awesome. my tuner says we still need to get on q16 because we will make more power and go faster. i know some are saying that isnt true but hell thats all this kid does is tune tune tune i think he knows what he is talking about. i guess we will just wait and see what happens.

what about e-98???????
__________________
04 EVO VIII
Silver
? hp/ ? tq
1/4mile - 10.6 (old setup)
E85 FLEX FUEL
TPG TUNING.

HTA 35r, AMS Manifold, Kelford 272 cams, ARP head studs, exedy twin, 2.3 stroker, BR ported manifold and TB, HKS DLI and timing belt, 1450cc injectors, supertech 1mm+ valve train, Vishnu cam gears, AEM EMS.

2.0 build on the way!

Big Thanks,
TPG TUNING
AMS - Eric
SHEP TRANS
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2009, 08:38 AM   #10
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (1)
 
slowr_evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 181

Drives: 06' Evo GSR 92' civic hatch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macaroni View Post
I didn't say anything about gas mileage. I was talking about consumption here. DD'ing on e-85 vs only using q-16 for the track and that's maybe 5 gallons tops.

I think the OP is trying to stay away from opinions and wanting something more along the lines of facts and figures and experience with both fuels on the same setup.

get em josh haha, **** man you have had good experence with Q-16...your numbers prove that.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2009, 08:46 AM   #11
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (28)
 
Mellon Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 6,395

Drives: 05 EVO & 91 Stealth TT

I have some good Q16 results and I'd love to run some e-85, Kevin and I picked up 50 gallons of it yesterday for his car but my fuel system wouldn't be able to keep up. I'm seriously thinking bout making it more robust so I can run e85. 10.00 per gallon vs 1.91 makes it very tempting.
__________________
- Chris
MellonTuning.com - Stock ECU custom tuning Flash ROMs for your EVO done via e-mail or local - NOW Tuning Evo 7, 8, 9, & 10's!

Stock ECU/MAS Full weight EVO records:
Quickest and fastest on 93 octane 10.41 @ 135
Fastest on e85 139.80
Highest WHP 703

*Video* 10.41 @ 135 on 93 octane

*video* 703awhp 539tq on e85


I'm going 9's in 09
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2009, 10:27 AM   #12
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Macaroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 460

Drives: 03 Mitsubishi Evolution

A lot of people see that and automatically choose e85. But how about the DDer with very little track time say once a month he goes to the track or perhaps gets called out and needs to run the Jesus Juice?

Let's say 2 people order 100 gallons of e85 and q16. Sure the price is a HUGE difference but the DDer on e85 is gonna run through that a lot faster than someone who just wants to make a few passes. In one night I made 6 passes plus driving to the track and back on q16 and only used 3 gallons of it.

If you run the track maybe twice a month that's only 72 gallons used in that year.
__________________
FPRed - 880cc injectors - Walbro 255 - Comp 280's - Prostreet Adj. cam gears - Shep trans and t-case - ACT 6 puck - EPM o2 dump - Ebay downpipe - HKS catback - ETS short route piping - Ebay fmic - 3" mafless intake - Tien S-tech's - ARP headstuds - AEM Tru Boost - AEM UEGO

Stock block - Stock head - Speed Density
TTR tuned
435 hp & 355 tq - 93 octane
494 hp & 415 tq - Q-16
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2009, 10:29 AM   #13
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (18)
 
SOEuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Panama City,FL or Baltimore,MD
Posts: 993

Drives: BBY 03 Evo VIII,06 GG IX MR,01 VW GTi,95 Eclipse GST(sold)

well Josh,as you know i am a Race gas lover...but im making the switch over to e85 this year

Join me brother hahaha
__________________
I.Y.A.A.Y.A.S. US Air Force
A.K.A. Evo_Stone
BPU +++ Evo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynoflash View Post
Ok, this is what is going on
All the Evo vendors are realizing what total crap boxes Evos and and how badly they suck. Now that they are seeing what kind of great results are being obtained with Subarus - of course everyone wants to jumop ship and drive a real car. LOL
How can you blame them? Subaru is the best, everyone knows that.

Al
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2009, 10:32 AM   #14
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (4)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
 
Macaroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 460

Drives: 03 Mitsubishi Evolution

There are not E-85 pumps over here in MS yet. So there would be no way for me to fill up. That's another reason I'm iffy about making the switch. And don't even think about saying I should stock up lol.
__________________
FPRed - 880cc injectors - Walbro 255 - Comp 280's - Prostreet Adj. cam gears - Shep trans and t-case - ACT 6 puck - EPM o2 dump - Ebay downpipe - HKS catback - ETS short route piping - Ebay fmic - 3" mafless intake - Tien S-tech's - ARP headstuds - AEM Tru Boost - AEM UEGO

Stock block - Stock head - Speed Density
TTR tuned
435 hp & 355 tq - 93 octane
494 hp & 415 tq - Q-16
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2009, 10:35 AM   #15
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (18)
 
SOEuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Panama City,FL or Baltimore,MD
Posts: 993

Drives: BBY 03 Evo VIII,06 GG IX MR,01 VW GTi,95 Eclipse GST(sold)

well,i have a few empty VP 55 gallon drums im gonna use,but ill have to make a trip to Alabama every few months to stock up

good thing i have a DD,i just cant keep buy these drums of race gas man,im poor
__________________
I.Y.A.A.Y.A.S. US Air Force
A.K.A. Evo_Stone
BPU +++ Evo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynoflash View Post
Ok, this is what is going on
All the Evo vendors are realizing what total crap boxes Evos and and how badly they suck. Now that they are seeing what kind of great results are being obtained with Subarus - of course everyone wants to jumop ship and drive a real car. LOL
How can you blame them? Subaru is the best, everyone knows that.

Al
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
e85, evo, fuel, gas, power, price, q16, race, tuned, tuning, versus

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0