View Single Post
Old Oct 17, 2009, 01:53 AM   #10
Ladogaboy
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 752

Drives: 2009 Lancer RA

Quote:
Originally Posted by dboz View Post
Interior is exactly the same. I have gotten 22.5 MPG in my GSR. Cheaper car, cheaper cost of ownership.....maybe? Brakes are cheaper. Tires are cheaper. Engine and tranny service still pricey. AWD system maintenance about the same costs also?! I really don't see the economy in a low 20 ish MPG daily driver. If all these items are a concern get the X. If you don't want to shift, get the MR or RA.
Cost of ownership is significantly higher with the EVO. I can't speak for individual experiences with fuel economy, but generally speaking, less power with taller gears equals better fuel economy. The EVO's tires and brakes are significantly more expensive than the RA, as are the costs to insure and register the car.

For some reason, I thought the GSR didn't have some of the interior options that the RA does, but I guess I'm wrong about that.

Also, a couple of other sticking points: less trunk space on the EVO and it has a stiffer suspension/harsher ride.
Online