View Single Post
Old Jun 23, 2006, 10:22 AM   #65
KevinD
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (40)
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
My Garage
 
KevinD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,813

Drives: '04 evo8 daily driver, '03 evo8 time attack car, 08 outlander

Send a message via AIM to KevinD
well, i hate to be the devils advocate here, but i don't think you addressed the major problem of having a pressure drop in your manifold quite like you should have. everyone goes to huge lengths to eliminate all the pressure drops up to the manifold and big gains are seen from some (air filter, lower intercooler pipe, larger intercooler, upper intercooler pipe, throttle body), and then you are going to restrict the flow down to a tiny channel between plenums. it seems very counter productive simply to give a good distributed flow to each of the cylinders.

what mass flow rates were you using in CFD?

also, what were the velocities going across the channel?
__________________
EVOLUTION DYNAMICS LLC
Tuning, Custom Fabrication, and installs in the DFW area.
www.evodynamics.com
email: evokevin@gmail.com
Phone + Text messages: 817-776-2170
Kelford, mil.spec, ACT, Aquamist, FIC, ShepTrans, Zeitronix, + many others


Evo Dynamics Unlimited Time Attack Build

3-Port PnP Boost controllers for Evo 8/9/X and RA

Join us on FaceBook!






Offline
 
Reply With Quote