Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Cast Iron VS Aluminum BLOCKS

Old Dec 26, 2005, 07:39 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
el producto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Cast Iron VS Aluminum BLOCKS

Is there any difference besides weight when it comes to these engine blocks.

I think I heard that the X will be an aluminum block, will it still be able to hold all the power that we give it??
Old Dec 26, 2005, 07:47 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
PA-silver03evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hanover, Pa
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read that too. I really dont like it as the cast iron block on the 4g63 has proven itself for such a long time. Why fix it if it isnt broke. I think it will be fine for anyone who does light modding but if you are planning on doing a lot, might want to stick with the evo 9. Not to mention the automatic trans with paddle shifting. I personally would wait and let other people do the testing before buying one to mod.
Old Dec 26, 2005, 07:59 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
thetox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arch Rustler of Jamesington
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
heat dissipation/retention is also different from aluminum to iron, with aluminum cooling down quicker
Old Dec 26, 2005, 08:02 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
 
x838nwy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I think Mitsu know the advantages of the cast iron block over the aluminium one. But the Al does have attractive qualities such as its ability to conduct heat better and being slightly cheaper to manufacture.

I'm sure if they do go that route, it's not going to be for no reason, but I think we will loose the ability to run our evo's at insane boost levels due to the decreased stiffness of the Al. [unless they use some really exotic alloys]

Strangely enough, the new Mazda Miata went from a 1.8l cast iron block to a 2.0l Al block. It lost only 5.4kg.
Old Dec 26, 2005, 10:45 AM
  #5  
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
purplegodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: atlanta
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by x838nwy
Well, I think Mitsu know the advantages of the cast iron block over the aluminium one. But the Al does have attractive qualities such as its ability to conduct heat better and being slightly cheaper to manufacture.

I'm sure if they do go that route, it's not going to be for no reason, but I think we will loose the ability to run our evo's at insane boost levels due to the decreased stiffness of the Al. [unless they use some really exotic alloys]

Strangely enough, the new Mazda Miata went from a 1.8l cast iron block to a 2.0l Al block. It lost only 5.4kg.

since when does aluminum cost less than iron?
Old Dec 26, 2005, 01:11 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
inco9nito99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Roselle, IL
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Umm...aluminum IS cheaper than iron -it is more readily available. Secondly, aluminum tends to react to heat much faster in expansion/shrinkage. This usually is the cause of hairline cracks in the block..you have to remember, there is coolant flowing around the walls of the piston chamber. High heat dissapating from the friction off the piston walls on the insides of the chamber and cool coolant flowing outside of the chamber. I don't think they'll resort to using aluminum blocks and if they do in my opinion the motor wont be able to withstand an FI application with high hp for too long esp. being a DD.
Old Dec 26, 2005, 02:19 PM
  #7  
Newbie
iTrader: (10)
 
Boost Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Des Plaines, IL
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really dont know about Aluminum being cheaper than Iron but what do I know. I do know that all aluminum blocks use iron sleaves so block integrity at high hp levels shouldnt be an issue.
Old Dec 26, 2005, 02:30 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
 
2GDSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aluminum Alloy is not even close to being as inexpensive as Iron...whoever even remotly thinks that is a baffling idiot. It can be cheaper to manufacture because its easier to work with, but no car company has elected to use Aluminum as a cost reduction technique.
Old Dec 26, 2005, 03:55 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
 
E. Haskell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aluminum can be repaired if damaged. It's not always weaker either.....look at the 4.6 Cobras that are running well over 1200hp with aluminum blocks.
Old Dec 26, 2005, 05:12 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
 
x838nwy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by purplegodzilla
since when does aluminum cost less than iron?
When you look at things like engine blocks, the majority of the cost comes from the machining operations rather than the material costs. If you look at it in the cast form the material cost is probably only 15% of the costs, in this case.

All in all, both materials should cost roughly the same to cast but this depends very much on the method chosen. But once you mass produce the part, the casting cost should not be a major issue.

The largest chunk of the cost is in machining and Al is much cheaper to machine. Another plus is the thermal conductivity of al means that you can have the cooling channels not so close to the surfaces which allows for shallower hole depths and larger tolerances all round. So machining cost will be reduced.

Going back to materials, if you look at how much al alloy coast per kg and how much an hour cost on a 3/4/5-axis CNC machining centre with gun drills, you'll get the picture.

Now I'm not saying that the cost saving will be the only reason why mitsu would switch, but it is one of the plus points. The reduction in engine block costs is probably not significant when you look at the selling price of the evo.

I do not know if car companies use al blocks as a cost reduction technique, and frankly I don't think I ever will since I do not sit in on their engineering meetings but I doubt they'd say in the brochure "we use al for the engine block to make it cheaper for us". As I mentioned, it is a plus point (if you don't include the cost of re-tooling) but not a major one.
Old Dec 26, 2005, 05:25 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Mercenary3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 678
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by E. Haskell
Aluminum can be repaired if damaged. It's not always weaker either.....look at the 4.6 Cobras that are running well over 1200hp with aluminum blocks.
The 03/04 cobras use an iron block, chief. Only the n/a cobras were running aluminum blocks.

Ive heard from several sources that Ford wanted to use an aluminum block on the upcomming 5.4L supercharged Shelby, but testing at production boost levels resulted in "catastrophic failures".
Old Dec 26, 2005, 06:42 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
 
E. Haskell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mercenary3
The 03/04 cobras use an iron block, chief. Only the n/a cobras were running aluminum blocks.

Ive heard from several sources that Ford wanted to use an aluminum block on the upcomming 5.4L supercharged Shelby, but testing at production boost levels resulted in "catastrophic failures".
Umm, notice I didn't specify 03/04 Cobras . The '96-'98 Cobras used aluminum and they are STRONG. Mihovitz is making 1500+hp with his block.

Another example is y2khawk(Harlan) who post on LS1tech, he traps 171mph @ 3350lbs and uses a stock LS1 block
Old Dec 26, 2005, 07:48 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Mookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
don't the new corvettes have aluminum blocks?
Old Dec 26, 2005, 08:05 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
 
E. Haskell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes
Old Dec 26, 2005, 08:35 PM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
EVOclub4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the middle of the pacific ocean
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is it true though that once you overheat it, you're f****? it gets all warped and stuff? not to the extreme but minor warping?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Cast Iron VS Aluminum BLOCKS



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:09 PM.