evolutionm.net - Home of the Lancer Evolution
Home Features Community Marketplace Registry Garage

Go Back   evolutionm.net > Lancer Ralliart Forums > 09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Welcome to EvolutionM.net!
Welcome to EvolutionM.net.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 1, 2009, 05:00 PM   #31
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 109

Drives: 2009 RA

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricJ@AMS View Post
That would sound about right without the pill.

Ok a base flash gets the RA around 235whp. Add the AMS intake and you get about 250whp. UR turboback should get at least +10whp so shouldn't I be at like
260 at least.

I don't understand why he could put the boost pill in????? Everyone else is having no problems with it.
__________________
AMS SR intake [X]AMS BOV Kit [X]
UR Turboback
[X]

IVEY TUNED at 266whp/260wtq.


Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2009, 06:00 PM   #32
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (10)
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rosedale, IN
Posts: 2,503

Drives: 2010 Ralliart Sportback.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RA Glows View Post
Ok a base flash gets the RA around 235whp. Add the AMS intake and you get about 250whp. UR turboback should get at least +10whp so shouldn't I be at like
260 at least.

I don't understand why he could put the boost pill in????? Everyone else is having no problems with it.
With the boost pill, you actually have to think about it when you tune the wastegate maps instead of using the same wastegate maps you have on every other car you have tuned Time thinking and experimenting on the dyno is expensive, if he agreed to do the tune for a flat fee instead of paying by the hour for the dyno / tuning time then it is in his best intrests financially to say "can't be done, too much torque"... which is complete BS.

Using the boost pill, and actually tuning the wastegate maps he could reduce mid range boost, and thus reduce the torque spike while increasing boost in the upper RPM's for more top end power. But setting all that up takes time on the dyno (or road tuning) if you have never done it before.... the second time it is easy cheesy.

Keith
__________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback... From stock to modified as follows in less than a week!
Buschur Racing FMIC, upper IC pipe, and lower IC pipe with EVO X BOV. AMS cat back exhaust, mini battery kit, and MAF housing from EVO X,Buschur Air filter mounted to EVO X MAF housing. Forge WG actuator, Ultimate Racing high flow cat.
Triple gauge pod with Wide band A/F ratio and boost.

Last edited by Fourdoor; Nov 1, 2009 at 06:02 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2009, 09:03 PM   #33
Silver Sponsor
Personal Sales Rating: (13)
 
Sean@Iveytune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Linden, NJ
Posts: 1,366

Drives: Ford F150HD Supercharged, R35 GTR 2010, 9 sec Fullweight evo8.

We made over 300 ftlb and 278 wheel hp with a car. The trans was slipping.(owner complained about going over 300ftlb)
I opted to turn the boost down( removed the boost pill as we made target boost without it), as I did not like the slippage.


Boost tables are no problem, we have done alot of these evox/ralliart setups.


Sean
__________________
WWW.IVEYTUNE.COM
DYNOJET AWD ON PREMISES!!!

2003 EVO8 9.17@159.6 MPH 3055 lb NO NITROUS! Full street!
1992 Talon AWD 9.41@151MPH (Oct 2005) Full exhaust, full glass 3122lb
1993.5 Supra 9.6@148 (Stock Auto, drag radials) 9.73@153mph 6 Speed!
Brandon's 1993.5 Supra 8.78@157.17 Slicks and BL400

HKS PRO DEALER!

Cobb Protuner "Live Data!"

Ecutek dealer, reflashes available for all yrs of evos.

Factory Trained Tuner FCON V-PRO, AEM EMS
, Haltech, Motec, Autronic.

Last edited by Sean@Iveytune; Nov 2, 2009 at 09:06 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2009, 10:46 PM   #34
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (10)
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rosedale, IN
Posts: 2,503

Drives: 2010 Ralliart Sportback.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean@Iveytune View Post
We made over 300 ftlb and 278 wheel hp with a car. The trans was slipping.(owner complained about going over 300ftlb)
I opted to turn the boost down( removed the boost pill as we made target boost without it), as I did not like the slippage.


Boost tables are no problem, we have done alot of these evox/ralliart setups.


Sean
What was target boost? I personally don't have a boost pill installed at the moment, I use the Forge wastegate actuator.

With the Wastegate duty cycle map set to all zero's, and the ECU prevented from adding wastegate percentage to reach target load, the forge wastage actuator gives the following curve:
1500 RPM 1.4 psi
2000 RPM 5.1 psi
2500 RPM 13.8 psi At 2700 RPM 18.3 psi wastegate starts to crack open
3000 RPM 17.6 psi
3500 RPM 19.4 psi
4000 RPM 21.1 psi At 4400 RPM reached peak boost of 22.3 psi
4500 RPM 21.9 psi
5000 RPM 21.6 psi
5500 RPM 20.0 psi
6000 RPM 17.6 psi


With my setup I am going 100% wastegate duty at low RPM to aid spoolup, ramping down in the mid range to limit mid range torque, and then ramping back up to maintain boost as much as possible in the upper RPM's I have the following results:

1500 RPM 1.4 psi
2000 RPM 5.3 psi
2500 RPM 16.3 psi
3000 RPM 23.6 psi
3500 RPM 25.5 psi
4000 RPM 25.4 psi
4500 RPM 25.4 psi
5000 RPM 24.9 psi
5500 RPM 23.1 psi
6000 RPM 20.4 psi

These boost levels are only seen on a long pull through 4th gear from below 1500 RPM up to 6000 RPM.... Can't go above 6200 RPM in 4th or I will travel back in time (or risk a large fine)

Lower boost levels are seen on a run through the gears as described in my thread about setting my new personal best 1/4 mile time in the Ralliart if you want to see that data.

Later,

Keith
__________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback... From stock to modified as follows in less than a week!
Buschur Racing FMIC, upper IC pipe, and lower IC pipe with EVO X BOV. AMS cat back exhaust, mini battery kit, and MAF housing from EVO X,Buschur Air filter mounted to EVO X MAF housing. Forge WG actuator, Ultimate Racing high flow cat.
Triple gauge pod with Wide band A/F ratio and boost.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 2009, 07:34 PM   #35
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Piper747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 172

Drives: Black 09 ralliart

I would be interested to see the timing and fuel used to avoid knock running that much boost with the stock turbo. I have done some experimenting of my own and have found that running the turbo that hard does not seem to provide the most power. All this from the butt dyno of course. You running 93 octane I guess?
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 2009, 07:51 PM   #36
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (10)
 
Fourdoor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rosedale, IN
Posts: 2,503

Drives: 2010 Ralliart Sportback.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piper747 View Post
I would be interested to see the timing and fuel used to avoid knock running that much boost with the stock turbo. I have done some experimenting of my own and have found that running the turbo that hard does not seem to provide the most power. All this from the butt dyno of course. You running 93 octane I guess?
Yup, 93 octane.

I have it set up this way because I seldom (other than when tuning) do pulls from low RPM to redline in 4th gear. On a run through the gears at the drag strip, or just ripping it up on the street (not street racing... just "spirited" driving) boost peaks at a lower 23.5 or under in gears 1,2,3, and 4 right where I want it. But in order to get those boost pressures on a run through the gears a long slow pull from low RPM will peak a bit higher than I like. I actually expect my higher than optimum boost to hurt performance on the dyno next week... but it is optimized for drag strip performance. In fact, all of my "over 4800 RPM" tuning will be based on data logs taken during a run through the gears rather than from data logs of a single gear pull. Below 4800 RPM tuning will be based on a long pull up to 5000 RPM... no reason to strain the system at high boost high RPM when it isn't necessary

Keith
__________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback... From stock to modified as follows in less than a week!
Buschur Racing FMIC, upper IC pipe, and lower IC pipe with EVO X BOV. AMS cat back exhaust, mini battery kit, and MAF housing from EVO X,Buschur Air filter mounted to EVO X MAF housing. Forge WG actuator, Ultimate Racing high flow cat.
Triple gauge pod with Wide band A/F ratio and boost.

Last edited by Fourdoor; Nov 3, 2009 at 07:55 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 03:44 AM   #37
Newbie
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
exv8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne. Australia.
Posts: 14

Drives: Honda FD2.

Looking to next week Keith....Ross.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 12:17 PM   #38
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 566

Drives: 2009 Lancer RA

Quote:
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports View Post
I'd wait on any hardware changes for a little bit.

Something will be of light soon.

- Bryan
You tease.

Maybe some will loosen those lips.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 03:58 PM   #39
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
show time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: INDY
Posts: 491

Drives: 2009 WW RA

I saw somebody saying that they tuned the car in normal mode instead of sport. And weren't having the big issues with the TC-SST slipping. Not a pro just repeating what I read. The thread was close because of arguing.
__________________
Injen UICP
Cosworth drop-in
Until Fed EX gets here with my damn orders.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 04:35 PM   #40
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
boondoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P. Pines, FL
Posts: 1,259

Drives: as fast as humanly possible.

Send a message via AIM to boondoc
Yea i stopped posting in that thread when the BS started.
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 04:42 PM   #41
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 109

Drives: 2009 RA

There was a thread open not to long ago with a guy who had SSP installing the clutch pack upgrade kit on his ralliart. This car was suppose to be their test mule. What ever happened to him?

I'd love to see AMS make a clutch pack setup for the EVO X/RA.
__________________
AMS SR intake [X]AMS BOV Kit [X]
UR Turboback
[X]

IVEY TUNED at 266whp/260wtq.


Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 04:48 PM   #42
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
boondoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P. Pines, FL
Posts: 1,259

Drives: as fast as humanly possible.

Send a message via AIM to boondoc
Quote:
Originally Posted by RA Glows View Post
There was a thread open not to long ago with a guy who had SSP installing the clutch pack upgrade kit on his ralliart. This car was suppose to be their test mule. What ever happened to him?

I'd love to see AMS make a clutch pack setup for the EVO X/RA.
Really? Do u have the link to that thread?
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 05:09 PM   #43
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 566

Drives: 2009 Lancer RA

I thought it was the MR. Maybe they had a RA too. It wouldn't be too hard to find out, though. Just check with Kris from SSP.

Either way, I'm going to wait to see what software patches are available. Especially since it will be a little while before I can make the jump to the EVO turbo.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 05:13 PM   #44
Evolving Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 109

Drives: 2009 RA

Here it is found it!!

Mr sst upgrades underway

Sorry it is an MR but still I'm wondering if they have had any sucess with this.
__________________
AMS SR intake [X]AMS BOV Kit [X]
UR Turboback
[X]

IVEY TUNED at 266whp/260wtq.


Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2009, 05:19 PM   #45
Evolved Member
Personal Sales Rating: (0)
 
boondoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P. Pines, FL
Posts: 1,259

Drives: as fast as humanly possible.

Send a message via AIM to boondoc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ladogaboy View Post
I thought it was the MR. Maybe they had a RA too. It wouldn't be too hard to find out, though. Just check with Kris from SSP.

Either way, I'm going to wait to see what software patches are available. Especially since it will be a little while before I can make the jump to the EVO turbo.
I am waiting for the patch as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RA Glows View Post
Here it is found it!!

Mr sst upgrades underway

Sorry it is an MR but still I'm wondering if they have had any sucess with this.
That is what i thought, TheSin also did his.
Online
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
163, 176, 2010, dyno, evo, mr, problem, programming, ralliart, ratio, starting, tcsst, tcu, tranny

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0