rpw stage 1 cam or rrm stage 2 cam?

blaire · Apr 10, 2009, 06:03 PM

any input on which camshaft to get? Its going into a 2004 ralliart with sri, exhaust, header/dp, piggyback, udp. I can't find much info on the rpw cam's other then the information I've gained through speaking with them personally. They've recommended their stage 1 cam over their stage 2 for my plans with the ralliart. Cost differs greatly here as well - ~840 CAN to get the rrm cam, ~530 CAN to get the rpw cam.

If anyone has experience with either, I'd greatly appreciate your input!

Ralliart_on_LSD · Apr 10, 2009, 08:54 PM

I have no experience with RPW but i know for a fact that the RRM camshaft is awesome, it gives you huge amounts of touque around the mivec switch over point. 3-4k rpms is like a whole new car. Top end gains are noticable to. So much tourque...

joeyj · Apr 11, 2009, 01:25 AM

see if you can get in touch with mitvrx, he started a thread about his experience with rpw.

http://forums.evolutionm.net/lancer-...ar-retune.html

biglou360 · Apr 11, 2009, 06:56 AM

i have the stage 2 cam and yes the touque is very noticeble.
im yet to tune my car, im having some finacial problems.

OttRalliart05 · Apr 11, 2009, 07:35 AM

I have a buddy running the RPW cam works great. Just make sure you set the valve lash according to Mitsu specs and procedure.

blaire · Apr 11, 2009, 12:01 PM

is he running the rpw stage 1 or stage 2?

Mitsubeastin · Apr 11, 2009, 12:43 PM

Im going turbo on my RA soon. Im thinking about going with the head and cam before I get the turbo and then get it tuned all at once.